|
Post by Administrator on Jul 28, 2006 21:52:44 GMT -5
The following was e-mailed to me;
« Message sent on Jun 20, 2006, 9:37am »
False information!
Hello. I am contacting you because someone posted an article about the bad behavior of a Chicago police officer by the name of Dyone Taylor. Dyone has been put through a lot because of this false report. She was brutalized by white police officers that didn't believe that she was an off duty officer. The incident was video taped but the officers that were there destroyed any footage.
Dyone doesn't drink and was not related to the man the officers were initially dealing with. This whole story has been a cover up for the police station and an internal investigating is underway but it's not likely that Dyone will recieve justice becasue of the lack of evidence. I just thought you should know.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Jul 28, 2006 21:52:44 GMT -5
The following was e-mailed to me;
« Message sent on Jun 20, 2006, 9:37am »
False information!
Hello. I am contacting you because someone posted an article about the bad behavior of a Chicago police officer by the name of Dyone Taylor. Dyone has been put through a lot because of this false report. She was brutalized by white police officers that didn't believe that she was an off duty officer. The incident was video taped but the officers that were there destroyed any footage.
Dyone doesn't drink and was not related to the man the officers were initially dealing with. This whole story has been a cover up for the police station and an internal investigating is underway but it's not likely that Dyone will recieve justice becasue of the lack of evidence. I just thought you should know.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Nov 22, 2005 21:34:17 GMT -5
Just curious to what your thoughts are on why the police officers would lie and say such things about her? I mean for police officers to lie is just not an everyday occurence, am I right? "Sarcasm"
Surely they got pictures of the bite marks on the officer, that would help or hurt the case? What of the other witnesses? Did the officers take statements from the crowd at the scene and see what "really" happened, other than the police officers version?
I must admit I love this one line from the article.
"Once in custody, the "officer" declined to give a statement to detectives."
I will say that the officer knows her "constitutional rights." Never ever-ever, give a statement or talk to the police unless you have an attorney present.
08/13/2005 - An off-duty Chicago police officer allegedly shoved one officer and bit another during a confrontation over the arrest of her neighbor for drinking cognac on the sidewalk, police said.
The incident happened late Sunday in the 400 block of West Evergreen Avenue near the Cabrini-Green housing complex. The charged officer, Dyone L. Taylor, has been stripped of her police powers and was charged with two felony counts of battery to an officer, said police spokesman Patrick Camden. Taylor, 37, was allegedly part of a mob that gathered around the two officers at 11:45 p.m. as they tried to arrest Ernest Shed for drinking in the public way after the saw him drinking from a bottle of cognac outside his apartment building at 445 W. Evergreen, Camden said.
Shed became combative, Camden said, and the crowd formed, shouting at the officers to let him go. The police called for backup because of growing tension, he said. Among the people yelling was Taylor, who lives at 435 W. Evergreen.
According to the officers, Taylor shouted obscenities at one officer, a woman, and shoved her. At the time, the officers did not know she was a police officer, Camden said. When they moved to put her in handcuffs along with Shed, she bit the female officer's partner, a man, on the arm. He was later treated and released, Camden said.
In all, five people were arrested.
As police walked her to the car to be transported to the East Chicago District station, she told officers she was a police officer, Camden said. Taylor is assigned to the Monroe District on the West Side and has been in the department since July 1998, according to police records.
Once in custody, she declined to give a statement to detectives, Camden said. He acknowledged that a complaint had been filed on her behalf with the Office of Professional Standards alleging excessive force in the arrest. Camden said Shed gave police a statement in which he said Taylor shoved the female officer. He was charged with drinking in the public way and disorderly conduct.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Nov 22, 2005 21:34:17 GMT -5
Just curious to what your thoughts are on why the police officers would lie and say such things about her? I mean for police officers to lie is just not an everyday occurence, am I right? "Sarcasm"
Surely they got pictures of the bite marks on the officer, that would help or hurt the case? What of the other witnesses? Did the officers take statements from the crowd at the scene and see what "really" happened, other than the police officers version?
I must admit I love this one line from the article.
"Once in custody, the "officer" declined to give a statement to detectives."
I will say that the officer knows her "constitutional rights." Never ever-ever, give a statement or talk to the police unless you have an attorney present.
08/13/2005 - An off-duty Chicago police officer allegedly shoved one officer and bit another during a confrontation over the arrest of her neighbor for drinking cognac on the sidewalk, police said.
The incident happened late Sunday in the 400 block of West Evergreen Avenue near the Cabrini-Green housing complex. The charged officer, Dyone L. Taylor, has been stripped of her police powers and was charged with two felony counts of battery to an officer, said police spokesman Patrick Camden. Taylor, 37, was allegedly part of a mob that gathered around the two officers at 11:45 p.m. as they tried to arrest Ernest Shed for drinking in the public way after the saw him drinking from a bottle of cognac outside his apartment building at 445 W. Evergreen, Camden said.
Shed became combative, Camden said, and the crowd formed, shouting at the officers to let him go. The police called for backup because of growing tension, he said. Among the people yelling was Taylor, who lives at 435 W. Evergreen.
According to the officers, Taylor shouted obscenities at one officer, a woman, and shoved her. At the time, the officers did not know she was a police officer, Camden said. When they moved to put her in handcuffs along with Shed, she bit the female officer's partner, a man, on the arm. He was later treated and released, Camden said.
In all, five people were arrested.
As police walked her to the car to be transported to the East Chicago District station, she told officers she was a police officer, Camden said. Taylor is assigned to the Monroe District on the West Side and has been in the department since July 1998, according to police records.
Once in custody, she declined to give a statement to detectives, Camden said. He acknowledged that a complaint had been filed on her behalf with the Office of Professional Standards alleging excessive force in the arrest. Camden said Shed gave police a statement in which he said Taylor shoved the female officer. He was charged with drinking in the public way and disorderly conduct.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Mar 31, 2007 17:34:01 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Mar 31, 2007 17:34:01 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Mar 31, 2007 17:31:38 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Mar 31, 2007 17:31:38 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Dec 17, 2005 0:41:24 GMT -5
Sixteen provisions of the USA Patriot Act expire December 31, 2005 if not renewed by Congress: Section 201: Gives federal officials the authority to intercept wire, spoken and electronic communications relating to terrorism. Section 202: Gives federal officials the authority to intercept wire, spoken and electronic communications relating to computer fraud and abuse offenses. Subsection 203(b): Permits the sharing of grand jury information that involves foreign intelligence or counterintelligence with federal law enforcement, intelligence, protective, immigration, national defense or national security officials Subsection 203(d): Gives foreign intelligence or counterintelligence officers the ability to share foreign intelligence information obtained as part of a criminal investigation with law enforcement. Section 204: Makes clear that nothing in the law regarding pen registers -- an electronic device which records all numbers dialed from a particular phone line -- stops the government's ability to obtain foreign intelligence information. Section 206: Allows federal officials to issue roving "John Doe" wiretaps for spy and anti-terrorism investigations. Section 207: Increases the amount of time that federal officials may watch people they suspect are spies or terrorists. Section 209: Permits the seizure of voicemail messages under a warrant. Section 212: Permits Internet service providers and other electronic communication and remote computing service providers to hand over records and e-mails to federal officials in emergency situations. Section 214: Allows use of a pen register or trap and trace devices -- a device that records the originating phone numbers of all incoming calls on a particular phone line -- in international terrorism or spy investigations. Section 215: Authorizes federal officials to obtain "tangible items" like business records, including those from libraries and bookstores, for foreign intelligence and international terrorism investigations. Section 217: Makes it lawful to intercept the wire or electronic communication of a computer hacker or intruder in certain circumstances. Section 218: Allows federal officials to wiretap or watch suspects if foreign intelligence gathering is a "significant purpose" for seeking a Federal Intelligence Surveillance Act order. The pre-Patriot Act standard said officials could ask for the surveillance only if it was "the" sole or main purpose. Section 220: Provides for nationwide service of search warrants for electronic evidence. Section 223: Amends the federal criminal code to provide for administrative discipline of federal officers or employees who violate prohibitions against unauthorized disclosures of information gathered under this act. Section 225: Amends FISA to prohibit lawsuits against people or companies that provide information to federal officials for a terrorism investigation.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Dec 17, 2005 0:35:35 GMT -5
The following "unpatriotic" Senators voted to continue taking away American's freedoms and rights.
YEAs ---52
Alexander (R-TN) Allard (R-CO) Allen (R-VA) Bennett (R-UT) Bond (R-MO) Brownback (R-KS) Bunning (R-KY) Burns (R-MT) Burr (R-NC) Chafee (R-RI) Chambliss (R-GA) Coburn (R-OK) Cochran (R-MS) Coleman (R-MN) Collins (R-ME) Cornyn (R-TX) Crapo (R-ID) DeMint (R-SC) DeWine (R-OH) Dole (R-NC) Domenici (R-NM) Ensign (R-NV) Enzi (R-WY) Graham (R-SC) Grassley (R-IA) Gregg (R-NH) Hatch (R-UT) Hutchison (R-TX) Inhofe (R-OK) Isakson (R-GA) Johnson (D-SD) Kyl (R-AZ) Lott (R-MS) Lugar (R-IN) Martinez (R-FL) McCain (R-AZ) <<--- ? McConnell (R-KY) Nelson (D-NE) Roberts (R-KS) Santorum (R-PA) Sessions (R-AL) Shelby (R-AL) Smith (R-OR) Snowe (R-ME) Specter (R-PA) Stevens (R-AK) Talent (R-MO) Thomas (R-WY) Thune (R-SD) Vitter (R-LA) Voinovich (R-OH) Warner (R-VA)
The following "patriotic" Senators voted to give back freedom and rights to Americans. NAYs ---47 Akaka (D-HI) Baucus (D-MT) Bayh (D-IN) Biden (D-DE) Bingaman (D-NM) Boxer (D-CA) Byrd (D-WV) Cantwell (D-WA) Carper (D-DE) Clinton (D-NY) Conrad (D-ND) Corzine (D-NJ) Craig (R-ID) Dayton (D-MN) Dorgan (D-ND) Durbin (D-IL) Feingold (D-WI) Feinstein (D-CA) Frist (R-TN) Hagel (R-NE) Harkin (D-IA) Inouye (D-HI) Jeffords (I-VT) Kennedy (D-MA) Kerry (D-MA) Kohl (D-WI) Landrieu (D-LA) Lautenberg (D-NJ) Leahy (D-VT) Levin (D-MI) Lieberman (D-CT) Lincoln (D-AR) Mikulski (D-MD) Murkowski (R-AK) Murray (D-WA) Nelson (D-FL) Obama (D-IL) Pryor (D-AR) Reed (D-RI) Reid (D-NV) Rockefeller (D-WV) Salazar (D-CO) Sarbanes (D-MD) Schumer (D-NY) Stabenow (D-MI) Sununu (R-NH) Wyden (D-OR)
Not Voting - 1
Dodd (D-CT)
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Dec 17, 2005 0:41:24 GMT -5
Sixteen provisions of the USA Patriot Act expire December 31, 2005 if not renewed by Congress: Section 201: Gives federal officials the authority to intercept wire, spoken and electronic communications relating to terrorism. Section 202: Gives federal officials the authority to intercept wire, spoken and electronic communications relating to computer fraud and abuse offenses. Subsection 203(b): Permits the sharing of grand jury information that involves foreign intelligence or counterintelligence with federal law enforcement, intelligence, protective, immigration, national defense or national security officials Subsection 203(d): Gives foreign intelligence or counterintelligence officers the ability to share foreign intelligence information obtained as part of a criminal investigation with law enforcement. Section 204: Makes clear that nothing in the law regarding pen registers -- an electronic device which records all numbers dialed from a particular phone line -- stops the government's ability to obtain foreign intelligence information. Section 206: Allows federal officials to issue roving "John Doe" wiretaps for spy and anti-terrorism investigations. Section 207: Increases the amount of time that federal officials may watch people they suspect are spies or terrorists. Section 209: Permits the seizure of voicemail messages under a warrant. Section 212: Permits Internet service providers and other electronic communication and remote computing service providers to hand over records and e-mails to federal officials in emergency situations. Section 214: Allows use of a pen register or trap and trace devices -- a device that records the originating phone numbers of all incoming calls on a particular phone line -- in international terrorism or spy investigations. Section 215: Authorizes federal officials to obtain "tangible items" like business records, including those from libraries and bookstores, for foreign intelligence and international terrorism investigations. Section 217: Makes it lawful to intercept the wire or electronic communication of a computer hacker or intruder in certain circumstances. Section 218: Allows federal officials to wiretap or watch suspects if foreign intelligence gathering is a "significant purpose" for seeking a Federal Intelligence Surveillance Act order. The pre-Patriot Act standard said officials could ask for the surveillance only if it was "the" sole or main purpose. Section 220: Provides for nationwide service of search warrants for electronic evidence. Section 223: Amends the federal criminal code to provide for administrative discipline of federal officers or employees who violate prohibitions against unauthorized disclosures of information gathered under this act. Section 225: Amends FISA to prohibit lawsuits against people or companies that provide information to federal officials for a terrorism investigation.
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Dec 17, 2005 0:35:35 GMT -5
The following "unpatriotic" Senators voted to continue taking away American's freedoms and rights.
YEAs ---52
Alexander (R-TN) Allard (R-CO) Allen (R-VA) Bennett (R-UT) Bond (R-MO) Brownback (R-KS) Bunning (R-KY) Burns (R-MT) Burr (R-NC) Chafee (R-RI) Chambliss (R-GA) Coburn (R-OK) Cochran (R-MS) Coleman (R-MN) Collins (R-ME) Cornyn (R-TX) Crapo (R-ID) DeMint (R-SC) DeWine (R-OH) Dole (R-NC) Domenici (R-NM) Ensign (R-NV) Enzi (R-WY) Graham (R-SC) Grassley (R-IA) Gregg (R-NH) Hatch (R-UT) Hutchison (R-TX) Inhofe (R-OK) Isakson (R-GA) Johnson (D-SD) Kyl (R-AZ) Lott (R-MS) Lugar (R-IN) Martinez (R-FL) McCain (R-AZ) <<--- ? McConnell (R-KY) Nelson (D-NE) Roberts (R-KS) Santorum (R-PA) Sessions (R-AL) Shelby (R-AL) Smith (R-OR) Snowe (R-ME) Specter (R-PA) Stevens (R-AK) Talent (R-MO) Thomas (R-WY) Thune (R-SD) Vitter (R-LA) Voinovich (R-OH) Warner (R-VA)
The following "patriotic" Senators voted to give back freedom and rights to Americans. NAYs ---47 Akaka (D-HI) Baucus (D-MT) Bayh (D-IN) Biden (D-DE) Bingaman (D-NM) Boxer (D-CA) Byrd (D-WV) Cantwell (D-WA) Carper (D-DE) Clinton (D-NY) Conrad (D-ND) Corzine (D-NJ) Craig (R-ID) Dayton (D-MN) Dorgan (D-ND) Durbin (D-IL) Feingold (D-WI) Feinstein (D-CA) Frist (R-TN) Hagel (R-NE) Harkin (D-IA) Inouye (D-HI) Jeffords (I-VT) Kennedy (D-MA) Kerry (D-MA) Kohl (D-WI) Landrieu (D-LA) Lautenberg (D-NJ) Leahy (D-VT) Levin (D-MI) Lieberman (D-CT) Lincoln (D-AR) Mikulski (D-MD) Murkowski (R-AK) Murray (D-WA) Nelson (D-FL) Obama (D-IL) Pryor (D-AR) Reed (D-RI) Reid (D-NV) Rockefeller (D-WV) Salazar (D-CO) Sarbanes (D-MD) Schumer (D-NY) Stabenow (D-MI) Sununu (R-NH) Wyden (D-OR)
Not Voting - 1
Dodd (D-CT)
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Dec 16, 2005 13:02:25 GMT -5
Senate Blocks Extension of Patriot Act The Senate today rejected attempts to reauthorize several provisions of the USA Patriot Act as infringing too much on Americans' privacy, dealing a major defeat to President Bush and Republican leaders. Whoa what a day! Talk about check and balances in our Government at work I applaud those Senators today for standing up for the true America Patriots of our country! The real American Patriots are the ones that doesn't need our government in our bed rooms, on our phones, in our mail, or anywhere else they think they can steal our rights. The final vote was 52-47 and yes I will be back soon to "bash" those unpatriotic Senators that have no respect for the Constitution or it's citizens. Oh what's that smell? Election time is rounding the corner. <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Also out today- Report of NSA Spying Prompts Call for Probe Seems Bush and Co. have been put on notice that a panel would hold hearings into a report that the National Security Agency eavesdropped without warrants on people inside the United. This can't be right? Our own government breaking the law?
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Dec 16, 2005 13:02:25 GMT -5
Senate Blocks Extension of Patriot Act The Senate today rejected attempts to reauthorize several provisions of the USA Patriot Act as infringing too much on Americans' privacy, dealing a major defeat to President Bush and Republican leaders. Whoa what a day! Talk about check and balances in our Government at work I applaud those Senators today for standing up for the true America Patriots of our country! The real American Patriots are the ones that doesn't need our government in our bed rooms, on our phones, in our mail, or anywhere else they think they can steal our rights. The final vote was 52-47 and yes I will be back soon to "bash" those unpatriotic Senators that have no respect for the Constitution or it's citizens. Oh what's that smell? Election time is rounding the corner. <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Also out today- Report of NSA Spying Prompts Call for Probe Seems Bush and Co. have been put on notice that a panel would hold hearings into a report that the National Security Agency eavesdropped without warrants on people inside the United. This can't be right? Our own government breaking the law?
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Nov 19, 2007 18:29:25 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Nov 19, 2007 18:26:27 GMT -5
AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS BIG DONKEY DICKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS BIG DONKEY DICKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS BIG DONKEY DICKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS BIG DONKEY DICKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Nov 19, 2007 18:29:25 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Nov 19, 2007 18:26:27 GMT -5
AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS BIG DONKEY DICKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS BIG DONKEY DICKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS BIG DONKEY DICKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS BIG DONKEY DICKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS AT&T SUCKS
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Jan 19, 2006 10:55:30 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Jan 19, 2006 10:55:30 GMT -5
|
|