|
Post by Critique on Jan 17, 2007 3:02:59 GMT -5
Judge Jim Bob Steel.
"JIM BOB"
He must be from the land of "I did Not Neither No Nuttin".
|
|
|
Post by Critique on Jan 17, 2007 3:02:59 GMT -5
Judge Jim Bob Steel.
"JIM BOB"
He must be from the land of "I did Not Neither No Nuttin".
|
|
|
Post by Critique on Jan 17, 2007 2:56:58 GMT -5
January 16, 2007 By JIM WILLIAMSON MINERAL SPRINGS. Ark.—A former Southwest Arkansas prosecutor and district court judge was arrested Friday in Mineral Springs for allegedly speeding, driving while intoxicated and refusing a chemical test. Jim Bob Steel, 57, of Nashville, Ark., was arrested about 3 p.m. Friday by Mineral Springs Police Patrolman Jeff Witherspoon on Arkansas Highway 355, said Mineral Springs Police Chief Billy Kuykendall. It was Steel’s second arrest in the past 19 months involving traffic incidents. Kuykendall said the patrol officer was using radar and recorded Steel’s vehicle traveling 49 mph in a 35-mph zone within the city limits. “He was originally stopped for speeding, not for drinking,” said Kuykendall. Steel drove just outside the city limits before stopping for the officer, he said. Witherspoon reportedly found an open can of beer in the vehicle. Under Arkansas law, when a driver signs the driver’s license, it gives implied consent the person will submit to blood or breath tests. If the driver refuses to take the breath or chemical tests, the officer can make an arrest on DWI charges based on their driving and actions at the time of the traffic stop. “He refused all field sobriety tests and chemical tests,” said Kuykendall. “He refused all field sobriety tests and chemical tests,” said Kuykendall. Witherspoon took Steel to the Howard County Jail in Nashville where he was charged with speeding, misdemeanor driving while intoxicated and refusing a chemical test, said the police chief. Steel was released to the custody of his daughter at the jail. Steel is to appear in Howard County District Court Feb. 15 to enter a plea to the three charges. He was not immediately available for comment on Monday. On June 17, 2005, Steel was driving his 1999 Nissan Maxima on Arkansas Highway 355, north of Tollette, when it collided with a van. According to reports, Steel crossed the center line and collided with the van. He was arrested on charges of leaving the scene of an accident involving injuries, a Class D felony. He was later found by law enforcement officials at his home. Steel was also arrested on charges of misdemeanor driving left of center. The felony carried a potential sentence of up to six years in prison and a maximum fine of $10,000. The collision was investigated by the Arkansas State Police. At the time of the 2005 incident, Steel was the Pike County District Court Judge in Murfreesboro. Steel served as the Ninth Judicial District-West prosecutor from 1982 to 1994. The district where Steel was the prosecutor included Little River, Howard, Sevier and Pike counties. The investigation into the collision in June 2005 by State Police Trooper Nate Wilson showed Steel had alcohol in the car. Despite alcohol being found in his abandoned vehicle, Steel wasn’t given a Breathalyzer test because he wasn’t in the car when police arrived at the accident scene, according to reports. Breath tests are usually done on the scene and not at a secondary location. Steel was represented by Texarkana attorney Jeff Harrelson. A civil lawsuit was filed by the family involved in the wreck and was eventually settled out of court. The lawsuit sought reimbursement for medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering and mental anguish. Billy Stewart Sr. was the driver of the van and the passengers were Tracy Staton, 31, Billy Stewart Jr., 7, Keyshaun Stewart, 3, Jawara Stewart, 13, and George and Mary Stewart, both 55. The settlement for the children included: Billy Stewart Jr., $3,875; Jawara Stewart, $6,650; and Keyshaun Stewart, $1,200. The settlement for the adults involved in the collision was undisclosed, records show. In a plea agreement reached on the criminal charges involving the accident, Steel resigned as the Pike County district court judge May 11, 2006. He was assessed an $800 fine after pleading guilty to assault in the first degree, a misdemeanor charge for leaving the scene of a two-vehicle crash. Harrelson said assault in the first degree has a definition where reckless behavior is an element of the law. Steel can continue to practice law in Arkansas. Attorney LeAnne Daniel of Nashville was appointed by then-Gov. Mike Huckabee to fill the unexpired term of Steel. Daniel also serves as the Mineral Springs city attorney. Harrelson, contacted Monday, was unaware of last week’s traffic incident and had not been contacted by Steel. www.texarkanagazette.com/articles/2007/01/16/local_news/news/news01.txt
|
|
|
Post by Critique on Jan 17, 2007 2:56:58 GMT -5
January 16, 2007 By JIM WILLIAMSON MINERAL SPRINGS. Ark.—A former Southwest Arkansas prosecutor and district court judge was arrested Friday in Mineral Springs for allegedly speeding, driving while intoxicated and refusing a chemical test. Jim Bob Steel, 57, of Nashville, Ark., was arrested about 3 p.m. Friday by Mineral Springs Police Patrolman Jeff Witherspoon on Arkansas Highway 355, said Mineral Springs Police Chief Billy Kuykendall. It was Steel’s second arrest in the past 19 months involving traffic incidents. Kuykendall said the patrol officer was using radar and recorded Steel’s vehicle traveling 49 mph in a 35-mph zone within the city limits. “He was originally stopped for speeding, not for drinking,” said Kuykendall. Steel drove just outside the city limits before stopping for the officer, he said. Witherspoon reportedly found an open can of beer in the vehicle. Under Arkansas law, when a driver signs the driver’s license, it gives implied consent the person will submit to blood or breath tests. If the driver refuses to take the breath or chemical tests, the officer can make an arrest on DWI charges based on their driving and actions at the time of the traffic stop. “He refused all field sobriety tests and chemical tests,” said Kuykendall. “He refused all field sobriety tests and chemical tests,” said Kuykendall. Witherspoon took Steel to the Howard County Jail in Nashville where he was charged with speeding, misdemeanor driving while intoxicated and refusing a chemical test, said the police chief. Steel was released to the custody of his daughter at the jail. Steel is to appear in Howard County District Court Feb. 15 to enter a plea to the three charges. He was not immediately available for comment on Monday. On June 17, 2005, Steel was driving his 1999 Nissan Maxima on Arkansas Highway 355, north of Tollette, when it collided with a van. According to reports, Steel crossed the center line and collided with the van. He was arrested on charges of leaving the scene of an accident involving injuries, a Class D felony. He was later found by law enforcement officials at his home. Steel was also arrested on charges of misdemeanor driving left of center. The felony carried a potential sentence of up to six years in prison and a maximum fine of $10,000. The collision was investigated by the Arkansas State Police. At the time of the 2005 incident, Steel was the Pike County District Court Judge in Murfreesboro. Steel served as the Ninth Judicial District-West prosecutor from 1982 to 1994. The district where Steel was the prosecutor included Little River, Howard, Sevier and Pike counties. The investigation into the collision in June 2005 by State Police Trooper Nate Wilson showed Steel had alcohol in the car. Despite alcohol being found in his abandoned vehicle, Steel wasn’t given a Breathalyzer test because he wasn’t in the car when police arrived at the accident scene, according to reports. Breath tests are usually done on the scene and not at a secondary location. Steel was represented by Texarkana attorney Jeff Harrelson. A civil lawsuit was filed by the family involved in the wreck and was eventually settled out of court. The lawsuit sought reimbursement for medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering and mental anguish. Billy Stewart Sr. was the driver of the van and the passengers were Tracy Staton, 31, Billy Stewart Jr., 7, Keyshaun Stewart, 3, Jawara Stewart, 13, and George and Mary Stewart, both 55. The settlement for the children included: Billy Stewart Jr., $3,875; Jawara Stewart, $6,650; and Keyshaun Stewart, $1,200. The settlement for the adults involved in the collision was undisclosed, records show. In a plea agreement reached on the criminal charges involving the accident, Steel resigned as the Pike County district court judge May 11, 2006. He was assessed an $800 fine after pleading guilty to assault in the first degree, a misdemeanor charge for leaving the scene of a two-vehicle crash. Harrelson said assault in the first degree has a definition where reckless behavior is an element of the law. Steel can continue to practice law in Arkansas. Attorney LeAnne Daniel of Nashville was appointed by then-Gov. Mike Huckabee to fill the unexpired term of Steel. Daniel also serves as the Mineral Springs city attorney. Harrelson, contacted Monday, was unaware of last week’s traffic incident and had not been contacted by Steel. www.texarkanagazette.com/articles/2007/01/16/local_news/news/news01.txt
|
|
|
Post by Critique on Jan 13, 2007 2:16:11 GMT -5
AIKEN, SOUTH, CAROLINA - Magistrate Judge Charles T. Carter has been suspended after his arrest on misconduct charges. An order from the South Carolina Supreme Court dated Wednesday placed Judge Carter on interim suspension and stated that neither Aiken County nor the town of Burnettown has to pay his salary while he’s not working at the Graniteville Magistrate Court. Judge Carter, 57, was charged Tuesday with two misdemeanors: misconduct in office and failure to report sexual misconduct. He was released from the Aiken County Detention Center on $10,000 bond. Judge Carter is accused of not telling authorities that one of his employees had an improper sexual relationship with a state inmate in August 2005. Aimee L. Barton, 36, of Aiken, was arrested Dec. 21 and charged with first-degree sexual misconduct with an inmate. She admitted to the charge in a written statement to authorities, according to arrest warrants. Arrest warrants from the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division state that Judge Carter learned of this affair in December 2005. A public official convicted of not reporting sexual misconduct to authorities could be fined up to $500 and sent to jail for six months. The second charge of misconduct in office is punishable by up to a year in jail and a $1,000 fine. The Aiken County Sheriff’s Office asked SLED to take over the case Nov. 9. Lt. Michael Frank, a spokesman for the sheriff’s office, said he was not sure how the agency learned of the relationship between the inmate and Ms. Barton. Ms. Barton resigned her position as a legal secretary Dec. 20, the day before she was arrested, according to County Administrator Clay Killian. Judge Carter was appointed to the Graniteville Magistrate Court position in July 1997 by Sen. Tommy Moore. He heard civil cases involving claims up to $7,500 and criminal cases in which the maximum punishment is a $500 fine or 30 days in jail. Aiken County has 10 Magistrate Court judges, who are recommended by state senators and approved by the governor. Mr. Killian said Judge Carter’s annual salary is $54,728.70, which is paid by Aiken County, although Judge Carter is not a county employee. Mr. Killian said he’s not sure if the county will continue to pay Judge Carter’s salary while the suspension lasts. Under normal circumstances, Mr. Killian said, an employee accused of misconduct would be suspended without pay but could use accrued time off. Judges don’t accrue time off, he said. “This is not a normal situation,” Mr. Killian said. chronicle.augusta.com/login.shtml?orq:http://chronicle.augusta.com/stories/011207/met_112208.shtmlSouth Carolina High Court Suspends Judge Charles T. Carter After Charges, Arrest For Misconduct
|
|
|
Post by Critique on Jan 13, 2007 2:16:11 GMT -5
AIKEN, SOUTH, CAROLINA - Magistrate Judge Charles T. Carter has been suspended after his arrest on misconduct charges. An order from the South Carolina Supreme Court dated Wednesday placed Judge Carter on interim suspension and stated that neither Aiken County nor the town of Burnettown has to pay his salary while he’s not working at the Graniteville Magistrate Court. Judge Carter, 57, was charged Tuesday with two misdemeanors: misconduct in office and failure to report sexual misconduct. He was released from the Aiken County Detention Center on $10,000 bond. Judge Carter is accused of not telling authorities that one of his employees had an improper sexual relationship with a state inmate in August 2005. Aimee L. Barton, 36, of Aiken, was arrested Dec. 21 and charged with first-degree sexual misconduct with an inmate. She admitted to the charge in a written statement to authorities, according to arrest warrants. Arrest warrants from the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division state that Judge Carter learned of this affair in December 2005. A public official convicted of not reporting sexual misconduct to authorities could be fined up to $500 and sent to jail for six months. The second charge of misconduct in office is punishable by up to a year in jail and a $1,000 fine. The Aiken County Sheriff’s Office asked SLED to take over the case Nov. 9. Lt. Michael Frank, a spokesman for the sheriff’s office, said he was not sure how the agency learned of the relationship between the inmate and Ms. Barton. Ms. Barton resigned her position as a legal secretary Dec. 20, the day before she was arrested, according to County Administrator Clay Killian. Judge Carter was appointed to the Graniteville Magistrate Court position in July 1997 by Sen. Tommy Moore. He heard civil cases involving claims up to $7,500 and criminal cases in which the maximum punishment is a $500 fine or 30 days in jail. Aiken County has 10 Magistrate Court judges, who are recommended by state senators and approved by the governor. Mr. Killian said Judge Carter’s annual salary is $54,728.70, which is paid by Aiken County, although Judge Carter is not a county employee. Mr. Killian said he’s not sure if the county will continue to pay Judge Carter’s salary while the suspension lasts. Under normal circumstances, Mr. Killian said, an employee accused of misconduct would be suspended without pay but could use accrued time off. Judges don’t accrue time off, he said. “This is not a normal situation,” Mr. Killian said. chronicle.augusta.com/login.shtml?orq:http://chronicle.augusta.com/stories/011207/met_112208.shtmlSouth Carolina High Court Suspends Judge Charles T. Carter After Charges, Arrest For Misconduct
|
|
|
Post by Critique on Jan 1, 2007 3:21:25 GMT -5
CA: DA blasts judge for sentence given to illegal immigrant (3 years for sex with 13-year-old)12/14/2006 by NormsRevenge Kern County District Attorney Ed Jagels blasted a local judge on Thursday for giving a lenient sentence to an illegal immigrant in the name of saving taxpayer money. Kern County Superior Court Judge Richard Oberholzer sentenced Jose Richard Leiva to three years in prison in October for having sex three times with a 13-year-old girl. This happened while Leiva was on probation for a misdemeanor conviction of having a sexual relationship with a 14-year-old girl. “In my 30 years as a prosecutor, I thought I had seen every conceivable example of judicial wackiness, but I was wrong,” Jagels wrote in a press release posted Thursday on his Web site. The Kern County Probation Department recommended Leiva be sentenced to 10 years in prison. But Oberholzer believed that this would burden taxpayers. He gave him the lowest possible term, reasoning he would be exported back to his country of origin after being released from prison, according to a transcript of the sentencing hearing, which Jagels posted on his Web site. “This is a serious offense,” Oberholzer said, according to the transcript. “And I expect him to be deported. I’m not in a position where I want to have to support him for the next five or six years or however long it takes to get him out of here.” Deputy District Attorney Chris Staiger argued to the judge that illegal immigrants can easily return to the United States after deportation and asked for a stiffer sentence. “The problem is that deportation is not final,” Staiger said. “If we could guarantee he wouldn’t be back, I would agree with Your Honor. The problem is that we know that our border is porous. We know that we will probably see him again.” Oberholzer argued that if Leiva returns, he would return to custody. Jagels and Staiger were not immediately available for comment. Leiva’s attorney, Nelson Castro, said he believed Leiva deserved to receive the lowest term because the relationship was consensual and he did not have a criminal record except for the misdemeanor. www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1753789/posts
|
|
|
Post by Critique on Jan 1, 2007 3:21:25 GMT -5
CA: DA blasts judge for sentence given to illegal immigrant (3 years for sex with 13-year-old)12/14/2006 by NormsRevenge Kern County District Attorney Ed Jagels blasted a local judge on Thursday for giving a lenient sentence to an illegal immigrant in the name of saving taxpayer money. Kern County Superior Court Judge Richard Oberholzer sentenced Jose Richard Leiva to three years in prison in October for having sex three times with a 13-year-old girl. This happened while Leiva was on probation for a misdemeanor conviction of having a sexual relationship with a 14-year-old girl. “In my 30 years as a prosecutor, I thought I had seen every conceivable example of judicial wackiness, but I was wrong,” Jagels wrote in a press release posted Thursday on his Web site. The Kern County Probation Department recommended Leiva be sentenced to 10 years in prison. But Oberholzer believed that this would burden taxpayers. He gave him the lowest possible term, reasoning he would be exported back to his country of origin after being released from prison, according to a transcript of the sentencing hearing, which Jagels posted on his Web site. “This is a serious offense,” Oberholzer said, according to the transcript. “And I expect him to be deported. I’m not in a position where I want to have to support him for the next five or six years or however long it takes to get him out of here.” Deputy District Attorney Chris Staiger argued to the judge that illegal immigrants can easily return to the United States after deportation and asked for a stiffer sentence. “The problem is that deportation is not final,” Staiger said. “If we could guarantee he wouldn’t be back, I would agree with Your Honor. The problem is that we know that our border is porous. We know that we will probably see him again.” Oberholzer argued that if Leiva returns, he would return to custody. Jagels and Staiger were not immediately available for comment. Leiva’s attorney, Nelson Castro, said he believed Leiva deserved to receive the lowest term because the relationship was consensual and he did not have a criminal record except for the misdemeanor. www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1753789/posts
|
|
|
Post by Critique on Dec 29, 2006 2:55:08 GMT -5
December 19, 2006 JACKSONVILLE, Fla. -- The man wrongly convicted of killing his sister-in-law faced a judge on Tuesday for a hearing his supporters hoped would lead to the state attorney's office dropping its case and setting him free. Instead, the hearing was delayed. In 1996, Chad Heins was convicted and sentenced to life in prison for the 1994 murder of his pregnant sister-in-law, Tina Heins. He spent more than 10 years in prison for the crime. Last week, his conviction was thrown out after DNA evidence found on the victim proved someone other than Heins was present when the murder was committed. Before Tuesday's hearing, Heins was talking with his defense counsel, appearing happy, smiling and laughing. The question buzzing inside of the courtroom was whether Heins would walk out the door a free man -- something he hadn't been in nearly 12 years. Defense attorneys were hoping Heins would be going home in time for the holidays. Instead, he remained locked up in the Duval County Jail, awaiting another court date. "Obviously, one hopes the situation gets resolved in the appropriate way, but it is clear as day that Chad Heins did not commit this crime," said Jenny Greenberg, of the Florida Innocence Initiative. Defense counsel and attorneys with the Florida Innocence Initiative said the evidence leaves more than enough reasonable doubt that Heins didn't murder his sister-in-law, and that he should go free. "It seems that given what we all know from these DNA results and the strength of the state's initial case, the least we can do is to have this man home with his family for Christmas," said Greenberg. Instead, Heins was led back to jail, shackled, wearing a green jump suit. He will wait for a hearing on a bond motion, which the judge said he would look into after the New Year. State Attorney Harry Shorestein told Channel 4 his office has not made a decision about what course of action it will take in Heins' case. www.news4jax.com/news/10568935/detail.html?subid=10101101
|
|
|
Post by Critique on Dec 29, 2006 2:55:08 GMT -5
December 19, 2006 JACKSONVILLE, Fla. -- The man wrongly convicted of killing his sister-in-law faced a judge on Tuesday for a hearing his supporters hoped would lead to the state attorney's office dropping its case and setting him free. Instead, the hearing was delayed. In 1996, Chad Heins was convicted and sentenced to life in prison for the 1994 murder of his pregnant sister-in-law, Tina Heins. He spent more than 10 years in prison for the crime. Last week, his conviction was thrown out after DNA evidence found on the victim proved someone other than Heins was present when the murder was committed. Before Tuesday's hearing, Heins was talking with his defense counsel, appearing happy, smiling and laughing. The question buzzing inside of the courtroom was whether Heins would walk out the door a free man -- something he hadn't been in nearly 12 years. Defense attorneys were hoping Heins would be going home in time for the holidays. Instead, he remained locked up in the Duval County Jail, awaiting another court date. "Obviously, one hopes the situation gets resolved in the appropriate way, but it is clear as day that Chad Heins did not commit this crime," said Jenny Greenberg, of the Florida Innocence Initiative. Defense counsel and attorneys with the Florida Innocence Initiative said the evidence leaves more than enough reasonable doubt that Heins didn't murder his sister-in-law, and that he should go free. "It seems that given what we all know from these DNA results and the strength of the state's initial case, the least we can do is to have this man home with his family for Christmas," said Greenberg. Instead, Heins was led back to jail, shackled, wearing a green jump suit. He will wait for a hearing on a bond motion, which the judge said he would look into after the New Year. State Attorney Harry Shorestein told Channel 4 his office has not made a decision about what course of action it will take in Heins' case. www.news4jax.com/news/10568935/detail.html?subid=10101101
|
|
|
Post by Critique on Jan 11, 2007 15:16:03 GMT -5
The name of this web site is Police Crimes. When a police officer commits a crime there is always an injured party. When a civilian violates a City Ordinance (littering) or a State Statute (expired tags) there is no injured party. Don't worry I'm not going to gang up on you but here is some meat for Shuftin's point. www.jail4judges.org/BlakColrLog/index.htmA trial jury that is free from harassment and control by the court is one of the principles on which the United States was founded. In fact, this principle was so important to those who founded this country that one of the 13 original states (Pennsylvania) was named after a defendant (William Penn) education.yahoo.com/search/be?lb=t&p=url%3Ap/penn__williamin an old English case in 1670 www.chrononhotonthologos.com/lawnotes/penntrial.htmwhere the court kept the jury imprisoned for about 2 weeks in order to force the jury to return the "guilty" verdict that the court wanted. However, the jury held out with its "not guilty" verdict and the court eventually released the jurors. The results of that case caused the courts in England at that time to recognize the independence of trial juries and were later made a part of the United States Constitution as its Sixth Amendment when the United States was founded. Now, we have the courts in the United States today doing exactly what that court in England did in 1670...
|
|
|
Post by Critique on Jan 11, 2007 15:16:03 GMT -5
The name of this web site is Police Crimes. When a police officer commits a crime there is always an injured party. When a civilian violates a City Ordinance (littering) or a State Statute (expired tags) there is no injured party. Don't worry I'm not going to gang up on you but here is some meat for Shuftin's point. www.jail4judges.org/BlakColrLog/index.htmA trial jury that is free from harassment and control by the court is one of the principles on which the United States was founded. In fact, this principle was so important to those who founded this country that one of the 13 original states (Pennsylvania) was named after a defendant (William Penn) education.yahoo.com/search/be?lb=t&p=url%3Ap/penn__williamin an old English case in 1670 www.chrononhotonthologos.com/lawnotes/penntrial.htmwhere the court kept the jury imprisoned for about 2 weeks in order to force the jury to return the "guilty" verdict that the court wanted. However, the jury held out with its "not guilty" verdict and the court eventually released the jurors. The results of that case caused the courts in England at that time to recognize the independence of trial juries and were later made a part of the United States Constitution as its Sixth Amendment when the United States was founded. Now, we have the courts in the United States today doing exactly what that court in England did in 1670...
|
|
|
Post by Critique on Jan 11, 2007 14:10:44 GMT -5
I am a 10 yr police veteran and I am genuinely interested in what people think of the police. Here is your chance to tell a cop what you think of him and all his brothers and sisters in law enforcement. B A A......B A A......BAA
|
|
|
Post by Critique on Jan 11, 2007 14:10:44 GMT -5
I am a 10 yr police veteran and I am genuinely interested in what people think of the police. Here is your chance to tell a cop what you think of him and all his brothers and sisters in law enforcement. B A A......B A A......BAA
|
|
|
Post by Critique on Jan 7, 2007 3:36:31 GMT -5
I like the style of the German policeing. I was stationed in Germany for six years. The City police force is broken down into very small units with even smaller zones to cover. A large city may have a hundred police buildings or posts in the city. They seldom go on patrols and when they do go on patrol it is usually on foot. When called they can arrive in two to three minutes on foot. The difference between American and German police is that German police carry machine guns and may or may not have a dog with them. Also when a German police officer shouts "Halt" you better halt in your tracks immediatly. He will only say it once and then he shoots. By and large the German police are the most friendly bunch I have ever encountered and the most respected and obeyed. They usually speak perfect English.
Side note a friend of mine got mouthy with a German police officer once and was thrown a flight of stairs. This was due proccess and no arrest was made. All in a nights work.
|
|
|
Post by Critique on Jan 7, 2007 3:36:31 GMT -5
I like the style of the German policeing. I was stationed in Germany for six years. The City police force is broken down into very small units with even smaller zones to cover. A large city may have a hundred police buildings or posts in the city. They seldom go on patrols and when they do go on patrol it is usually on foot. When called they can arrive in two to three minutes on foot. The difference between American and German police is that German police carry machine guns and may or may not have a dog with them. Also when a German police officer shouts "Halt" you better halt in your tracks immediatly. He will only say it once and then he shoots. By and large the German police are the most friendly bunch I have ever encountered and the most respected and obeyed. They usually speak perfect English.
Side note a friend of mine got mouthy with a German police officer once and was thrown a flight of stairs. This was due proccess and no arrest was made. All in a nights work.
|
|
|
Post by Critique on Feb 2, 2007 2:50:57 GMT -5
gc505
That is so cool. Thank you. We don't advocate action on this web site but information is indeed power. What people do from here is up to them. Inside information is always welcomed and appreciated.
|
|
|
Post by Critique on Feb 2, 2007 2:50:57 GMT -5
gc505
That is so cool. Thank you. We don't advocate action on this web site but information is indeed power. What people do from here is up to them. Inside information is always welcomed and appreciated.
|
|