|
Post by WaTcHeR on Feb 27, 2006 11:08:30 GMT -5
02/27/2006 - MEDFORD A Massachusetts State Police officer is under arrest and charged with coercion and enticement, said the FBI on Saturday.
Sgt. Brian O’Hare, a veteran of the department for 19-years, could spend up to five years in prison after he was arrested at the Meadow Glen Mall in Medford during a sex sting operation on Friday.
In a statement released by the State Police, Lt. Sharon S. Costine of the Public Affairs Unit says, “The Department is aware of the arrest and the seriousness of the allegations made against Sgt. Brian O'Hare. The Department will be monitoring the proceedings as they progress.”
According to State Police, O’Hare has been suspended without pay
|
|
|
Post by WaTcHeR on Feb 27, 2006 11:08:30 GMT -5
02/27/2006 - MEDFORD A Massachusetts State Police officer is under arrest and charged with coercion and enticement, said the FBI on Saturday.
Sgt. Brian O’Hare, a veteran of the department for 19-years, could spend up to five years in prison after he was arrested at the Meadow Glen Mall in Medford during a sex sting operation on Friday.
In a statement released by the State Police, Lt. Sharon S. Costine of the Public Affairs Unit says, “The Department is aware of the arrest and the seriousness of the allegations made against Sgt. Brian O'Hare. The Department will be monitoring the proceedings as they progress.”
According to State Police, O’Hare has been suspended without pay
|
|
|
Post by WaTcHeR on Feb 27, 2006 11:13:01 GMT -5
02/22/2006 - ATLANTA -- A Cobb County man has filed a federal lawsuit against the Cobb County Police Department and several of its officers. Twenty-three-year-old Kalu Ugah says the officers dragged him from his car, beat him and called him racist names.
Ugah says the bruises on his face, the pain in his back, neck, hands and legs are the result of brutality by Cobb County Police.
Ugah says, “They were stomping on my head…It was a lot of kicking, a lot of beating.”
Ugah says it all started when he pulled into his apartment complex late one night. He says an officer pulled up behind him and ordered him out of the car, but, he says the complex card key entry island blocked his car door.
Ugah says, “I wasn’t resisting arrest.”
He says that’s when the officer drew his gun, and other officers pulled up.
“He pulled me out through the passenger side of the door, slammed me on the ground and that’s when they started beating me…calling me racial names,” he says.
Ugah was charged with DUI and reckless driving. Charges his attorney denies.
So, why did officers stop him?
Attorney Philip Holloway answers, “I don’t know. But even assuming for the sake of argument he’s guilty, the force used in this arrest was uncalled for.”
Ugah filed an internal affairs complaint. And a federal civil rights lawsuit against the officers and Cobb County.
Attorney Adam Jaffe says, “We believe it’s racially motivated.” Jaffe continues, “He’s a student. He has a job. He’s a good person, a good citizen. He gets stopped and he gets beat.”
Ugah says, “I just want them, I want justice to be served.”
Police say the internal affairs investigation continues, and they say the officers’ dashboard camera recorded the stop.
Because of the lawsuit, the department said they cannot comment of this case.
|
|
|
Post by WaTcHeR on Feb 27, 2006 11:13:01 GMT -5
02/22/2006 - ATLANTA -- A Cobb County man has filed a federal lawsuit against the Cobb County Police Department and several of its officers. Twenty-three-year-old Kalu Ugah says the officers dragged him from his car, beat him and called him racist names.
Ugah says the bruises on his face, the pain in his back, neck, hands and legs are the result of brutality by Cobb County Police.
Ugah says, “They were stomping on my head…It was a lot of kicking, a lot of beating.”
Ugah says it all started when he pulled into his apartment complex late one night. He says an officer pulled up behind him and ordered him out of the car, but, he says the complex card key entry island blocked his car door.
Ugah says, “I wasn’t resisting arrest.”
He says that’s when the officer drew his gun, and other officers pulled up.
“He pulled me out through the passenger side of the door, slammed me on the ground and that’s when they started beating me…calling me racial names,” he says.
Ugah was charged with DUI and reckless driving. Charges his attorney denies.
So, why did officers stop him?
Attorney Philip Holloway answers, “I don’t know. But even assuming for the sake of argument he’s guilty, the force used in this arrest was uncalled for.”
Ugah filed an internal affairs complaint. And a federal civil rights lawsuit against the officers and Cobb County.
Attorney Adam Jaffe says, “We believe it’s racially motivated.” Jaffe continues, “He’s a student. He has a job. He’s a good person, a good citizen. He gets stopped and he gets beat.”
Ugah says, “I just want them, I want justice to be served.”
Police say the internal affairs investigation continues, and they say the officers’ dashboard camera recorded the stop.
Because of the lawsuit, the department said they cannot comment of this case.
|
|
|
Post by WaTcHeR on Mar 3, 2006 15:24:58 GMT -5
03/03/2006 - CHARLESTON, W. Va. — A small-town police chief was accused in a federal lawsuit Thursday of stopping a would-be rescuer from performing CPR on a gay heart attack victim because he assumed the ailing man had HIV and posed a health risk.
Claude Green, 43, died June 21 after being stricken yards from City Hall in Welch, a community of about 2,400.
The American Civil Liberties Union sued on behalf of his mother.
Police Chief Bobby Bowman called the allegations "a boldface lie." He said that he called an ambulance and that Green was taken to the hospital in "no more than nine minutes."
"No one refused him CPR as his sister and mom are saying. They can do what they want, but if they're saying I refused him CPR, that is no way true," Bowman said.
The lawsuit accuses Bowman of pulling off Green's friend Billy Snead as Snead was performing chest compressions on the man. Snead was a passenger in Green's pickup when Green collapsed; Snead had managed to pull over the vehicle.
Snead said in an interview that he didn't realize at first it was Bowman giving the order and continued working on his friend. Bowman repeated his command to get away, saying that Green was HIV positive, then grabbed Snead by the shoulders and told him to sit on the curb, Snead said.
"He was a police officer so I got out the way. I assumed he would help. I didn't want to be a hindrance," Snead said. "He also told the ambulance drivers that he was HIV positive and to be careful."
Green was pronounced dead at the hospital after about 30 minutes of attempts to revive him.
Rose Saxe, a lawyer with the ACLU's AIDS Project, said Bowman's alleged actions contributed to Green's death and violated the Americans with Disabilities Act, equal protection laws and due process rights.
Saxe said Green's death was "tragically senseless" because he did not have the AIDS virus, but added that he should have received lifesaving care even if he was HIV-positive.
"He was simply a gay man in Welch, West Virginia. And because of that we can only assume that Chief Bowman assumed he had HIV and it was unsafe to even touch him," Saxe said.
When asked if he knew if Green was gay, Bowman would not answer and referred questions to McDowell County Assistant Prosecuting Attorney Danny Barie, who also represents the City of Welch.
Barie said Thursday he had received a copy of the complaint but could not comment because he had not reviewed it or discussed it with Bowman.
|
|
|
Post by WaTcHeR on Mar 3, 2006 15:24:58 GMT -5
03/03/2006 - CHARLESTON, W. Va. — A small-town police chief was accused in a federal lawsuit Thursday of stopping a would-be rescuer from performing CPR on a gay heart attack victim because he assumed the ailing man had HIV and posed a health risk.
Claude Green, 43, died June 21 after being stricken yards from City Hall in Welch, a community of about 2,400.
The American Civil Liberties Union sued on behalf of his mother.
Police Chief Bobby Bowman called the allegations "a boldface lie." He said that he called an ambulance and that Green was taken to the hospital in "no more than nine minutes."
"No one refused him CPR as his sister and mom are saying. They can do what they want, but if they're saying I refused him CPR, that is no way true," Bowman said.
The lawsuit accuses Bowman of pulling off Green's friend Billy Snead as Snead was performing chest compressions on the man. Snead was a passenger in Green's pickup when Green collapsed; Snead had managed to pull over the vehicle.
Snead said in an interview that he didn't realize at first it was Bowman giving the order and continued working on his friend. Bowman repeated his command to get away, saying that Green was HIV positive, then grabbed Snead by the shoulders and told him to sit on the curb, Snead said.
"He was a police officer so I got out the way. I assumed he would help. I didn't want to be a hindrance," Snead said. "He also told the ambulance drivers that he was HIV positive and to be careful."
Green was pronounced dead at the hospital after about 30 minutes of attempts to revive him.
Rose Saxe, a lawyer with the ACLU's AIDS Project, said Bowman's alleged actions contributed to Green's death and violated the Americans with Disabilities Act, equal protection laws and due process rights.
Saxe said Green's death was "tragically senseless" because he did not have the AIDS virus, but added that he should have received lifesaving care even if he was HIV-positive.
"He was simply a gay man in Welch, West Virginia. And because of that we can only assume that Chief Bowman assumed he had HIV and it was unsafe to even touch him," Saxe said.
When asked if he knew if Green was gay, Bowman would not answer and referred questions to McDowell County Assistant Prosecuting Attorney Danny Barie, who also represents the City of Welch.
Barie said Thursday he had received a copy of the complaint but could not comment because he had not reviewed it or discussed it with Bowman.
|
|
|
Post by WaTcHeR on Mar 6, 2006 11:21:43 GMT -5
03/06/2006 - LAS VEGAS A retired Air Force lieutenant colonel and his wife are seeking $5 million in damages from police, who he claims overreacted to a family member's report that he was suicidal and had guns in the house.
A North Las Vegas police spokesman acknowledges SWAT officers burst through a glass door of the house in an affluent neighborhood and that Thomas Spear was cut.
But he insists police acted appropriately after five hours watching Spear slumped over a kitchen table in March 2004.
Spear's 57 -- a former pilot and Nellis Air Force Base fighter squadron commander.
He says he took too much medication after brain surgery and didn't know police were outside his house.
A lawyer for Thomas and Linda Spear says police acted like they were engaged in some kind of exercise.
|
|
|
Post by WaTcHeR on Mar 6, 2006 11:21:43 GMT -5
03/06/2006 - LAS VEGAS A retired Air Force lieutenant colonel and his wife are seeking $5 million in damages from police, who he claims overreacted to a family member's report that he was suicidal and had guns in the house.
A North Las Vegas police spokesman acknowledges SWAT officers burst through a glass door of the house in an affluent neighborhood and that Thomas Spear was cut.
But he insists police acted appropriately after five hours watching Spear slumped over a kitchen table in March 2004.
Spear's 57 -- a former pilot and Nellis Air Force Base fighter squadron commander.
He says he took too much medication after brain surgery and didn't know police were outside his house.
A lawyer for Thomas and Linda Spear says police acted like they were engaged in some kind of exercise.
|
|
|
Post by WaTcHeR on Jan 6, 2006 13:37:59 GMT -5
Velazquez, who was off duty at the time, said he kept the gun at his side and did not point it toward any of the youths, said Bruce Bartlett, the chief assistant in State Attorney Bernie McCabe's office. Bartlett said prosecutors decided Velazquez's actions were necessary and not unlawful. No sir, police officers never do wrong. You know police officers like Mario R. Velazquez, have to go to sleep at some point.
|
|
|
Post by WaTcHeR on Jan 6, 2006 13:37:59 GMT -5
Velazquez, who was off duty at the time, said he kept the gun at his side and did not point it toward any of the youths, said Bruce Bartlett, the chief assistant in State Attorney Bernie McCabe's office. Bartlett said prosecutors decided Velazquez's actions were necessary and not unlawful. No sir, police officers never do wrong. You know police officers like Mario R. Velazquez, have to go to sleep at some point.
|
|
|
Post by WaTcHeR on Jan 13, 2006 17:07:41 GMT -5
So he was shot down in flames by the secretary? I wonder why she wouldn't go out with a devious, low life scum?
Ok what can I say positive about this story? Well at least the officer isn't sticking it to 14 year old girl or pulling over women and giving them a choice between a blow job or go to jail.
There I said something positive, even though the officer probably did use the police database to get the information.
|
|
|
Post by WaTcHeR on Jan 13, 2006 17:07:41 GMT -5
So he was shot down in flames by the secretary? I wonder why she wouldn't go out with a devious, low life scum?
Ok what can I say positive about this story? Well at least the officer isn't sticking it to 14 year old girl or pulling over women and giving them a choice between a blow job or go to jail.
There I said something positive, even though the officer probably did use the police database to get the information.
|
|
|
Post by WaTcHeR on Jan 13, 2006 17:00:56 GMT -5
01/13/2006 - CANTON - A Stark County judge on Thursday dismissed a criminal charge against a city police officer accused of using a police computer system to try to arrange a date.
Prosecutors failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Officer Steven Fowler violated the law, Common Pleas Judge Lee Sinclair concluded.
``It worked out the way it should have,'' defense attorney Charlene Selinsky Hardy said. ``I never thought they could prove this case.''
Fowler, 37, who declined to comment afterward, exchanged a high-five with Canton Police Patrolmen's Association President John Miller outside the courtroom.
He was accused of using the Ohio Law Enforcement Automated Data System in January 2004 to trace the license plate number of a legal secretary to track her down in an unsuccessful attempt to get a date.
He was fired in May 2004, then rehired after an arbitrator ruled the punishment was too severe. He was later placed on paid suspension.
Miller said Fowler should be able to return to work immediately.
|
|
|
Post by WaTcHeR on Jan 13, 2006 17:00:56 GMT -5
01/13/2006 - CANTON - A Stark County judge on Thursday dismissed a criminal charge against a city police officer accused of using a police computer system to try to arrange a date.
Prosecutors failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Officer Steven Fowler violated the law, Common Pleas Judge Lee Sinclair concluded.
``It worked out the way it should have,'' defense attorney Charlene Selinsky Hardy said. ``I never thought they could prove this case.''
Fowler, 37, who declined to comment afterward, exchanged a high-five with Canton Police Patrolmen's Association President John Miller outside the courtroom.
He was accused of using the Ohio Law Enforcement Automated Data System in January 2004 to trace the license plate number of a legal secretary to track her down in an unsuccessful attempt to get a date.
He was fired in May 2004, then rehired after an arbitrator ruled the punishment was too severe. He was later placed on paid suspension.
Miller said Fowler should be able to return to work immediately.
|
|
|
Post by WaTcHeR on Jan 20, 2006 0:36:43 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by WaTcHeR on Jan 20, 2006 0:36:43 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by WaTcHeR on Jan 13, 2006 17:29:32 GMT -5
Seems officer E.A. Bentley just saw an opportunity to indulge in a fishing expedition on an innocent citizen. I wonder if officer Bentley goes home everyday and has to wipe the shit off his nose, just because he sticks it where it don't belong.
I had about the same sort of incident occur actually not long ago with an employee of mine. An employee had ask to take a break and go outside and smoke a cigarette. A few minutes later another employee came to me and said that a cop was talking to the employee that had gone on break. Since I allowed this employee to take a break on the clock, I considered that employee to still be my responsibility, so I go outside to see what is going on.
When I go outside there is a undercover narcotics officer who I was familiar with, talking to my employee on the sidewalk. I question him to what was taking place with my employee. He starts to assure me that everything is ok, it was just a misunderstanding. I ask what was it that was misunderstood. He said he had driven by and saw the employee and thought the person was smoking a "joint" and he stopped to investigate.
I then asked the employee to tell me what happened. The employee said that the guy pulled up in front of them and jumped out demanding to know what they was smoking, because it sure looks like a dope. The employee stated that when the officer saw that it wasn't dope and that it even looked and smelled like a cigarette, that the officer accused the employee of lying. The employee then said the officer grabbed the employees hands and started to smell the employees fingers. For those who don't know why the officer did that, it was to see if he could smell "Mary Jane" on the employees fingers.
By now there was 4-5 employees and a few customers listening in on the conversation. The employee then said that the officer had demanded the employee to empty all there pockets and show what was in them. At this point I was pretty pissed. I then told the employee and a group of ten people or so, that the officer violated this person rights. I told them that you never have to talk to a police officer or answer any questions they might ask. At this point the officer was getting pissed and trying to leave, I don't blame him because the crowd wasn't all that happy at that point with him either. He was saying this was bull shit and I was full of it. As he gets in his vehicle I suggest that he might think about transferring to another department other than narcotics, since he seems to have trouble identifying a legal cigarette and what marijuana looks and smells like.
Fishing expeditions on innocent citizens are for losers!
|
|
|
Post by WaTcHeR on Jan 13, 2006 17:29:32 GMT -5
Seems officer E.A. Bentley just saw an opportunity to indulge in a fishing expedition on an innocent citizen. I wonder if officer Bentley goes home everyday and has to wipe the shit off his nose, just because he sticks it where it don't belong.
I had about the same sort of incident occur actually not long ago with an employee of mine. An employee had ask to take a break and go outside and smoke a cigarette. A few minutes later another employee came to me and said that a cop was talking to the employee that had gone on break. Since I allowed this employee to take a break on the clock, I considered that employee to still be my responsibility, so I go outside to see what is going on.
When I go outside there is a undercover narcotics officer who I was familiar with, talking to my employee on the sidewalk. I question him to what was taking place with my employee. He starts to assure me that everything is ok, it was just a misunderstanding. I ask what was it that was misunderstood. He said he had driven by and saw the employee and thought the person was smoking a "joint" and he stopped to investigate.
I then asked the employee to tell me what happened. The employee said that the guy pulled up in front of them and jumped out demanding to know what they was smoking, because it sure looks like a dope. The employee stated that when the officer saw that it wasn't dope and that it even looked and smelled like a cigarette, that the officer accused the employee of lying. The employee then said the officer grabbed the employees hands and started to smell the employees fingers. For those who don't know why the officer did that, it was to see if he could smell "Mary Jane" on the employees fingers.
By now there was 4-5 employees and a few customers listening in on the conversation. The employee then said that the officer had demanded the employee to empty all there pockets and show what was in them. At this point I was pretty pissed. I then told the employee and a group of ten people or so, that the officer violated this person rights. I told them that you never have to talk to a police officer or answer any questions they might ask. At this point the officer was getting pissed and trying to leave, I don't blame him because the crowd wasn't all that happy at that point with him either. He was saying this was bull shit and I was full of it. As he gets in his vehicle I suggest that he might think about transferring to another department other than narcotics, since he seems to have trouble identifying a legal cigarette and what marijuana looks and smells like.
Fishing expeditions on innocent citizens are for losers!
|
|
|
Post by WaTcHeR on Jan 13, 2006 17:17:59 GMT -5
01/13/2006 - A father's voice trembled as he described how a police officer threw his son to the ground in their front yard and handcuffed him.
The mother, a retired schoolteacher who did not witness the incident, was in tears at the very thought that "seven carloads of police" had come to her home and had taken not one but two of her adult sons to jail. When Lorenza and Ernestine Fields called me last fall to report what had happened at their east Fort Worth home, I found it hard to believe that all the chaos had resulted from a young man smoking a cigarette in his parents' front yard.
Based on official police reports and interviews with family members, James Fields and his half brother, Samuel Fails III, were at their parents' home on the afternoon of Sept. 30, 2005, when James decided he wanted to smoke. The parents don't allow smoking in the house, so James went outside and lit up a cigarette.
Fort Worth police officer E.A. Bentley, driving by the home on Druid Court, noticed James smoking and stopped his car to question James about whether he was old enough to possess a cigarette.
As the officer approached, James went inside the house. The officer said he went to the door, rang the bell and told the person who answered (Samuel) that he wanted to speak with the person who had just entered the home -- to verify his age.
Samuel called for James to come to the door. "I also called his father, Lorenza, to the door," said Samuel, 44. "The officer asked James to step outside, with which he complied. I also went outside.
Immediately, the officer asked James, 'Why didn't you stop when I called you?' James replied, 'I didn't know you were talking to me.'"
Bentley asked to see James' identification, but James said he had no ID on him. Both Lorenza and Samuel had told the officer that James was 21, and Lorenza said he offered to get James' birth certificate from the house to prove it.
"Witness #1 [Lorenza] told me that AP#1 [James] was of legal age, and I informed him that he was now being detained for going into the house when I told him to come over for the cigarette" questioning, Bentley wrote in his report.
During the discussion outside, James went toward the steps of the house, and that's when the situation took a turn for the worse.
"As I was again attempting to explain to [Lorenza] what my purpose for being there was, I heard [Samuel] tell [James] that I was harassing them and had no business talking to them and told [James] to go into the house," Bentley wrote. James "then started walking towards the front door of the residence, at which time I took hold of [James'] right arm with my left hand, and told him to come have a seat in my police vehicle, which was to prevent [James] from leaving the area and help contain the situation."
Everyone present, including the Fields' 11-year-old grandson, Ryan Fails, agreed that Lorenza tried to step between James and the officer while continuing to beg Bentley to leave his son alone.
"I grabbed Lorenza and said, 'Don't touch him, man, this guy will shoot you,'" Samuel said. "James jerked away from the officer. The officer then threw James to the ground. I told the officer that he was out of line and that he needed to get up off of James when he was handcuffing him. He told me and Lorenza if we keep talking, he'd take us to jail, and to 'just shut up!'" Bentley called for back-up, and several police cars showed up.
In the meantime, Samuel had gotten a pen and paper to begin getting officers' names and badge numbers. "That's when one of the other officers that had arrived on the scene came over and asked, 'Which one of you is Samuel Fails?'" Samuel said. "I replied, 'I am.' The officer said, 'Turn around, you are under arrest.'"
Samuel said he asked the arresting officer, "You are going to arrest me without asking me anything? He said again, 'Turn around.' I complied and was handcuffed and escorted to the police car."
Both Samuel and James were arrested, taken to jail and charged with evading arrest/detention and interfering with public duties.
In addition to the treatment outside their parents' home and the time in jail, Samuel and James had to spend money on bail and attorneys -- none of which should have ever happened.
First of all, the officer should never have stopped to question James, who, by the way, is indeed 21 (born March 24, 1984, the date that clearly appears on the arrest record) even if he thought James was underage.
James was at a private residence minding his own business, and I would hate to think Fort Worth police make a habit of going on private property to question "suspects" about violating the underage smoking law.
And even if he thought James was an underage smoker, Bentley should have ended his "investigation" as soon as James' father appeared at the door and identified himself.
Note that the city ordinance governing underage possession of cigarettes states: "A person who is younger than 18 years of age commits an offense if the person: possesses, purchases, consumes or accepts receipt of a cigarette or tobacco product."
But then there is a very clear exception to that ordinance: "It is an exception to this section that the minor possessed, purchased, consumed or received the cigarette or tobacco product in the presence of the minor's parent, guardian or spouse."
So, had James actually been an underage smoker, the fact that he was at his parents' home with his father present meant no law was broken.
The officer in this case, perhaps beginning with good intentions, overreacted and is responsible for escalating a situation that should never have occurred. The Tarrant County District Attorney's Office apparently understood that.
The cases against James and Samuel were dismissed last month. In papers filed with County Criminal Court No. 7, the stated reason for the dismissals was: "In the interests of justice."
Yes, justice did prevail, but this is a family that has been harmed, and they deserve more.
Last month, Samuel and Lorenza filed an official complaint with the Internal Affairs Division of the Fort Worth Police Department. This is one case in which the department, which never likes to admit a mistake, owes this family an apology.
How about it, Chief Ralph Mendoza?
|
|
|
Post by WaTcHeR on Jan 13, 2006 17:17:59 GMT -5
01/13/2006 - A father's voice trembled as he described how a police officer threw his son to the ground in their front yard and handcuffed him.
The mother, a retired schoolteacher who did not witness the incident, was in tears at the very thought that "seven carloads of police" had come to her home and had taken not one but two of her adult sons to jail. When Lorenza and Ernestine Fields called me last fall to report what had happened at their east Fort Worth home, I found it hard to believe that all the chaos had resulted from a young man smoking a cigarette in his parents' front yard.
Based on official police reports and interviews with family members, James Fields and his half brother, Samuel Fails III, were at their parents' home on the afternoon of Sept. 30, 2005, when James decided he wanted to smoke. The parents don't allow smoking in the house, so James went outside and lit up a cigarette.
Fort Worth police officer E.A. Bentley, driving by the home on Druid Court, noticed James smoking and stopped his car to question James about whether he was old enough to possess a cigarette.
As the officer approached, James went inside the house. The officer said he went to the door, rang the bell and told the person who answered (Samuel) that he wanted to speak with the person who had just entered the home -- to verify his age.
Samuel called for James to come to the door. "I also called his father, Lorenza, to the door," said Samuel, 44. "The officer asked James to step outside, with which he complied. I also went outside.
Immediately, the officer asked James, 'Why didn't you stop when I called you?' James replied, 'I didn't know you were talking to me.'"
Bentley asked to see James' identification, but James said he had no ID on him. Both Lorenza and Samuel had told the officer that James was 21, and Lorenza said he offered to get James' birth certificate from the house to prove it.
"Witness #1 [Lorenza] told me that AP#1 [James] was of legal age, and I informed him that he was now being detained for going into the house when I told him to come over for the cigarette" questioning, Bentley wrote in his report.
During the discussion outside, James went toward the steps of the house, and that's when the situation took a turn for the worse.
"As I was again attempting to explain to [Lorenza] what my purpose for being there was, I heard [Samuel] tell [James] that I was harassing them and had no business talking to them and told [James] to go into the house," Bentley wrote. James "then started walking towards the front door of the residence, at which time I took hold of [James'] right arm with my left hand, and told him to come have a seat in my police vehicle, which was to prevent [James] from leaving the area and help contain the situation."
Everyone present, including the Fields' 11-year-old grandson, Ryan Fails, agreed that Lorenza tried to step between James and the officer while continuing to beg Bentley to leave his son alone.
"I grabbed Lorenza and said, 'Don't touch him, man, this guy will shoot you,'" Samuel said. "James jerked away from the officer. The officer then threw James to the ground. I told the officer that he was out of line and that he needed to get up off of James when he was handcuffing him. He told me and Lorenza if we keep talking, he'd take us to jail, and to 'just shut up!'" Bentley called for back-up, and several police cars showed up.
In the meantime, Samuel had gotten a pen and paper to begin getting officers' names and badge numbers. "That's when one of the other officers that had arrived on the scene came over and asked, 'Which one of you is Samuel Fails?'" Samuel said. "I replied, 'I am.' The officer said, 'Turn around, you are under arrest.'"
Samuel said he asked the arresting officer, "You are going to arrest me without asking me anything? He said again, 'Turn around.' I complied and was handcuffed and escorted to the police car."
Both Samuel and James were arrested, taken to jail and charged with evading arrest/detention and interfering with public duties.
In addition to the treatment outside their parents' home and the time in jail, Samuel and James had to spend money on bail and attorneys -- none of which should have ever happened.
First of all, the officer should never have stopped to question James, who, by the way, is indeed 21 (born March 24, 1984, the date that clearly appears on the arrest record) even if he thought James was underage.
James was at a private residence minding his own business, and I would hate to think Fort Worth police make a habit of going on private property to question "suspects" about violating the underage smoking law.
And even if he thought James was an underage smoker, Bentley should have ended his "investigation" as soon as James' father appeared at the door and identified himself.
Note that the city ordinance governing underage possession of cigarettes states: "A person who is younger than 18 years of age commits an offense if the person: possesses, purchases, consumes or accepts receipt of a cigarette or tobacco product."
But then there is a very clear exception to that ordinance: "It is an exception to this section that the minor possessed, purchased, consumed or received the cigarette or tobacco product in the presence of the minor's parent, guardian or spouse."
So, had James actually been an underage smoker, the fact that he was at his parents' home with his father present meant no law was broken.
The officer in this case, perhaps beginning with good intentions, overreacted and is responsible for escalating a situation that should never have occurred. The Tarrant County District Attorney's Office apparently understood that.
The cases against James and Samuel were dismissed last month. In papers filed with County Criminal Court No. 7, the stated reason for the dismissals was: "In the interests of justice."
Yes, justice did prevail, but this is a family that has been harmed, and they deserve more.
Last month, Samuel and Lorenza filed an official complaint with the Internal Affairs Division of the Fort Worth Police Department. This is one case in which the department, which never likes to admit a mistake, owes this family an apology.
How about it, Chief Ralph Mendoza?
|
|